Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ingram Micro Holding Corporation
How Ingram Micro Holding Corporation stacks up
INGM · against 307 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #30 of 308 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including INGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 89% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INGM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 305 reported | 6.9% | 2.5% | 92% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 311 reported | 13.3% | 4.2% | 94% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | -3.8% | 2.9% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 306 reported | 70.0% | 23.7% | 93% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INGM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 1 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 | |
| 5 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 28 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 85 | 52 | |
| 28 | 4.9B USD | 85 | 50 | |
| 30 | 986.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 84 | 52 | |
| 30 | 9.3B USD | 84 | 59 | |
| 30 | 6.1B USD | 84 | 51 | |
| 33 | 174.5B TWD (≈$5.4B) | 83 | 49 | |
| 33 | 7.6B USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 33 | 7.1B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 36 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 82 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score