Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ingram Micro Holding Corporation
How Ingram Micro Holding Corporation stacks up
INGM · against 310 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #221 of 311 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score31 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including INGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital, but weaker operating margin than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 70% of peers. Operating margin: 1.8% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.0% vs peer median 2.9%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on invested capital: 10.8% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INGM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 293 reported | 10.8% | 11.4% | 48% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 308 reported | 1.8% | 8.9% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 301 reported | 2.0% | 4.5% | 30% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 293 reported | 10.3% | 11.6% | 41% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 312 reported | 6.6% | 39.1% | 5% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INGM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 863.2B INR (≈$10.4B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 2 | 7.3B USD | 99 | 68 | |
| 217 | 5.5B USD | 44 | 43 | |
| 221 | 152.5B TWD (≈$4.7B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 221 | 84.2B CNY (≈$11.8B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 221 | 3.9B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 221 | 6.1B USD | 43 | 51 | |
| 221 | 4.6B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 226 | 34.7B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 46 | |
| 226 | 6.1B USD | 42 | 39 | |
| 228 | 108.0B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 41 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score