Ranked #15 of 71 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
2 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ING · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 66% of peers. Book yield: 67.7% vs peer median 79.5%
●Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 10.4% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ING, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
ING
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 72 reported
8.5%
7.8%
61%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 15 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 30 reported
Not reported
10.2%
—
—
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 70 reported
64.1%
56.5%
67%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
