Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to InterCure Ltd.
How InterCure Ltd. stacks up
INCR · against 65 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
33/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 66 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including INCR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: -5.8% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 62% of peers. Operating margin: 2.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INCR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INCR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 47 reported | Not reported | -18.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 61 reported | 2.5% | -18.0% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 71 reported | -5.8% | -8.9% | 59% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 65 reported | -9.3% | -18.4% | 64% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 74 reported | 15.1% | 41.7% | 26% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INCR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 144.4B KRW (≈$104M) | 88 | 56 | |
| 2 | 376M BRL (≈$68M) | 81 | 56 | |
| 3 | 5.6B JPY (≈$38M) | 68 | 55 | |
| 4 | 277M MYR (≈$61M) | 62 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1.1B NOK (≈$105M) | 59 | 58 | |
| 23 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 35 | 25 | |
| 24 | 148M AUD (≈$98M) | 34 | 39 | |
| 25 | 2.9B TWD (≈$90M) | 33 | 58 | |
| 25 | 131M CAD (≈$96M) | 33 | 40 | |
| 25 | 60M USD | 33 | 33 | |
| 28 | 51M EUR (≈$56M) | 31 | 22 | |
| 29 | 252M HKD (≈$32M) | 29 | 17 | |
| 29 | 82M USD | 29 | 27 | |
| 31 | 580M HKD (≈$74M) | 27 | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score