Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Immatics N.V.
How Immatics N.V. stacks up
IMTX · against 465 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #319 of 466 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score148 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including IMTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -23.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -38.2% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -21.7% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMTX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 456 reported | Not reported | 1.3% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 471 reported | -38.2% | 4.2% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | -22.1% | -2.5% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 462 reported | 51.0% | 41.3% | 61% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMTX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 14.8B MXN (≈$800M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 319 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 319 | 660M USD | 8 | ||
| 319 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 319 | 552M USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 319 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 26 | |
| 319 | 1.2B USD | 8 | 6 | |
| 319 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 50 | |
| 319 | 927M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 319 | 820M USD | 8 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score