Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Terrestrial Energy Inc.
How Terrestrial Energy Inc. stacks up
IMSR · against 83 other Utilities companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #84 of 84 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including IMSR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -12.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on invested capital: -20.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMSR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMSR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 81 reported | -20.3% | 3.1% | 6% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 81 reported | Not reported | 10.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 85 reported | -12.2% | 1.6% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 83 reported | -27.4% | 4.3% | 4% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 86 reported | 0.0% | 26.3% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMSR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B BRL (≈$561M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 53.6B JPY (≈$365M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 3 | 460M SGD (≈$350M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 4 | 440M USD | 90 | 76 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 88 | 88 | |
| 80 | 4.0B CNY (≈$566M) | 1 | 15 | |
| 80 | 230M USD | 1 | 37 | |
| 80 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 1 | 44 | |
| 80 | 584M USD | 1 | 25 | |
| 84 | 369M USD | 0 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score