Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMO · against 34 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 35 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | IMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 4.5% | 7.0% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 34 reported | 8.5% | 10.4% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 5.3% | 5.9% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 23.4% | 38.0% | 22% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 75 | 59 | |
| 5 | 33.9B USD | 71 | 71 | |
| 22 | 64.3B USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 22 | 58.3B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 24 | 109.0B USD | 35 | 58 | |
| 25 | 58.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 26 | 66.8B USD | 32 | 49 | |
| 27 | 53.9B USD | 31 | 42 | |
| 28 | 77.4B USD | 30 | 43 | |
| 29 | 433.8B BRL (≈$78.1B) | 28 | 41 | |
| 30 | 73.2B USD | 26 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score