Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMNM · against 379 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #280 of 380 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score101 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including IMNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | IMNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 370 reported | -12.4% | 2.1% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | -14.3% | 4.5% | 9% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | -9.5% | -0.2% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 370 reported | 22.8% | 32.6% | 34% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 280 | 1.4B USD | 8 | 38 | |
| 280 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 280 | 4.7B USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 280 | 3.0B USD | 8 | 54 | |
| 280 | 2.4B USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 280 | 4.0B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 280 | 3.1B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 280 | 1.7B USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 280 | 1.3B USD | 8 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score