Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMMP · against 23 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #20 of 24 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including IMMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | IMMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 18 reported | Not reported | -35.9% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 22 reported | -560.5% | -122.6% | 24% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 28 reported | -39.1% | -24.5% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 25 reported | -77.3% | -72.1% | 42% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 30 reported | 0.0% | 16.0% | 14% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B JPY (≈$38M) | 68 | 55 | |
| 2 | 110M HKD (≈$14M) | 55 | 28 | |
| 3 | 3.5B JPY (≈$24M) | 49 | 48 | |
| 4 | 272M HKD (≈$35M) | 42 | 59 | |
| 5 | 17M USD | 41 | 16 | |
| 16 | 18M AUD (≈$12M) | 8 | 7 | |
| 16 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 8 | 48 | |
| 18 | 3.4B JPY (≈$23M) | 7 | 5 | |
| 19 | 12M USD | 5 | 38 | |
| 20 | 22M USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 21 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 3 | 48 | |
| 22 | 17M USD | 2 | 10 | |
| 23 | 34M USD | 1 | 19 | |
| 23 | 22M AUD (≈$15M) | 1 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score