Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMDX · against 84 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #60 of 85 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including IMDX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | IMDX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | -55.5% | -13.1% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | -51.1% | -3.4% | 17% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | -34.6% | -13.0% | 32% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 73 reported | -23.8% | 70.2% | 7% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 834M HKD (≈$107M) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 212M AUD (≈$140M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 4.5B TWD (≈$138M) | 98 | 62 | |
| 60 | 115M USD | 8 | 8 | |
| 60 | 82M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 60 | 118M USD | 8 | 13 | |
| 60 | 67M USD | 8 | ||
| 60 | 90M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 60 | 172M USD | 8 | 3 | |
| 60 | 172M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 60 | 94M USD | 8 | 8 | |
| 60 | 100M CHF (≈$115M) | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score