Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMDX · against 99 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #97 of 100 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including IMDX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMDX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | Not reported | 0.23× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 96 reported | 1.80 | 0.71 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 101 reported | 2.00× | 2.38× | 47% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 2 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 3 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1.1B NOK (≈$105M) | 96 | 58 | |
| 5 | 111M USD | 96 | ||
| 93 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 2 | 29 | |
| 94 | 126M USD | 2 | 32 | |
| 95 | 118M USD | 2 | 13 | |
| 96 | 110M USD | 2 | 38 | |
| 97 | 90M USD | 2 | 27 | |
| 98 | 153M AUD (≈$101M) | 1 | 0 | |
| 99 | 133M EUR (≈$147M) | 1 | 36 | |
| 100 | 580M HKD (≈$74M) | 0 | 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score