Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IMAX Corporation
How IMAX Corporation stacks up
IMAX · against 122 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #91 of 123 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including IMAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.5% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMAX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 1.4% | 2.8% | 39% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 4.5% | 8.0% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 3.6% | 6.6% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 12.9% | 46.4% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMAX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 87 | 2.5B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 32 | 42 | |
| 88 | 736.3B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 31 | 69 | |
| 89 | 39.0B HKD (≈$5.0B) | 30 | 38 | |
| 89 | 3.8B USD | 30 | 39 | |
| 91 | 2.8B USD | 29 | 67 | |
| 92 | 227.4B INR (≈$2.7B) | 27 | 69 | |
| 92 | 3.7B USD | 27 | 23 | |
| 92 | 14.7B SEK (≈$1.5B) | 27 | 57 | |
| 95 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score