Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMAX · against 128 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #18 of 129 · scores higher than 87% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including IMAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and beta, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 125 reported | 0.63× | 0.40× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 124 reported | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 4.26× | 1.47× | 91% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 93.9B MXN (≈$5.1B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 4 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 29 | |
| 5 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 65 | |
| 14 | 1.6B USD | 89 | 66 | |
| 15 | 4.1B USD | 88 | 44 | |
| 16 | 1.5B USD | 87 | 79 | |
| 17 | 505.7B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 87 | 71 | |
| 18 | 2.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 19 | 227.4B INR (≈$2.7B) | 86 | 69 | |
| 20 | 2.1B USD | 85 | 64 | |
| 21 | 153.6B INR (≈$1.8B) | 85 | 51 | |
| 22 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 83 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score