Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Industrial Logistics Properties Trust
How Industrial Logistics Properties Trust stacks up
ILPT · against 213 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 214 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ILPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -11.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.7% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ILPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ILPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 232 reported | -11.0% | 5.5% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 215 reported | 6.3% | 5.3% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 16.0% | 9.8% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 235 reported | 107.4% | 126.2% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ILPT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 98 | 1.1B NZD (≈$669M) | 56 | 62 | |
| 99 | 22.9B INR (≈$275M) | 55 | 62 | |
| 99 | 18.8B THB (≈$527M) | 55 | 68 | |
| 101 | 522M USD | 54 | 30 | |
| 101 | 430M USD | 54 | 34 | |
| 101 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 54 | 53 | |
| 101 | 591M EUR (≈$650M) | 54 | 62 | |
| 105 | 2.6B SEK (≈$257M) | 53 | 53 | |
| 105 | 3.9B SEK (≈$386M) | 53 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score