Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ILPT · against 236 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #230 of 237 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ILPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ILPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 235 reported | 4.98× | 0.86× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 233 reported | 2.50 | 0.59 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 235 reported | 4.31× | 1.57× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$225M) | 99 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1.1B SGD (≈$828M) | 98 | 31 | |
| 226 | 4.0B SEK (≈$399M) | 9 | 16 | |
| 227 | 522M USD | 7 | 30 | |
| 228 | 2.0B CNY (≈$276M) | 6 | 24 | |
| 229 | 10.7B TWD (≈$332M) | 6 | 21 | |
| 230 | 430M USD | 6 | 34 | |
| 231 | 850M USD | 5 | 24 | |
| 232 | 708M USD | 5 | 58 | |
| 233 | 2.4B CNY (≈$341M) | 5 | 4 | |
| 234 | 4.6B CNY (≈$645M) | 3 | 6 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score