Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ILMN · against 75 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 76 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ILMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ILMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 73 reported | 0.89× | 0.50× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 73 reported | 1.42 | 0.80 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 72 reported | 1.80× | 1.80× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B USD | 93 | 28 | |
| 2 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 4 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 5 | 25.8B USD | 83 | 75 | |
| 62 | 66.3B USD | 20 | 30 | |
| 63 | 33.3B USD | 19 | 24 | |
| 64 | 21.7B USD | 19 | 32 | |
| 65 | 36.4B USD | 19 | 50 | |
| 66 | 36.0B USD | 18 | 46 | |
| 67 | 73.2B SAR (≈$19.8B) | 13 | 56 | |
| 68 | 21.4B USD | 12 | 67 | |
| 69 | 34.3B USD | 9 | 57 | |
| 70 | 58.6B USD | 7 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score