Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Illumina, Inc.
How Illumina, Inc. stacks up
ILMN · against 557 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #62 of 558 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score38 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including ILMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 80% of peers. Operating margin: 19.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 85% of peers. Return on invested capital: 18.4% vs peer median 4.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 93% of peers. Return on assets: 12.4% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ILMN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ILMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 517 reported | 18.4% | -7.0% | 87% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 479 reported | 19.6% | -2.4% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 582 reported | 12.4% | -7.8% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 531 reported | 32.3% | -19.7% | 93% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 601 reported | 67.9% | 43.9% | 70% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ILMN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 563M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 408M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 17.0B USD | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 52.8B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 53 | 10.8B USD | 90 | 65 | |
| 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score