Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IHS Holding Limited
How IHS Holding Limited stacks up
IHS · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 176 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including IHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 89% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 25.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 23.4% vs peer median 5.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 19.3% | 2.9% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 13.3% | 6.1% | 97% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 22.5% | 5.9% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | -6.4% | 63.5% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 6 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 6 | 946M USD | 93 | 56 | |
| 6 | 284M USD | 93 | 57 | |
| 9 | 1.7B USD | 92 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score