Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IHG · against 102 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #98 of 103 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including IHG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IHG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 101 reported | Not reported | 0.78× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 104 reported | 1.02 | 0.81 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 97 reported | 0.66× | 1.34× | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 2 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 3 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 4 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 5 | 24.2B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 94 | 39.3B USD | 9 | 53 | |
| 95 | 42.8B USD | 7 | 54 | |
| 96 | 24.8B USD | 7 | 64 | |
| 97 | 24.1B USD | 6 | 63 | |
| 98 | 24.9B USD | 4 | 49 | |
| 99 | 34.3B USD | 3 | 60 | |
| 100 | 38.3B USD | 2 | 57 | |
| 101 | 49.1B USD | 2 | 15 | |
| 102 | 11.5B EUR (≈$12.7B) | 2 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score