Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IES Holdings, Inc.
How IES Holdings, Inc. stacks up
IESC · against 363 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #168 of 364 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including IESC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IESC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IESC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 350 reported | 5.5% | 4.2% | 72% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 365 reported | 7.3% | 7.4% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | Not reported | 4.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 347 reported | 15.2% | 34.4% | 16% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IESC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.28T KRW (≈$4.5B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 37.8B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 86 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 168 | 25.0B MYR (≈$5.5B) | 53 | 73 | |
| 168 | 2.05T JPY (≈$13.9B) | 53 | 45 | |
| 168 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 168 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 53 | 51 | |
| 168 | 8.6B USD | 53 | 68 | |
| 168 | 6.7B USD | 53 | 69 | |
| 168 | 7.5B USD | 53 | 49 | |
| 168 | 7.6B EUR (≈$8.3B) | 53 | 37 | |
| 177 | 50.3B CNY (≈$7.0B) | 52 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score