Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Icahn Enterprises L.P.
How Icahn Enterprises L.P. stacks up
IEP · against 125 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #119 of 126 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including IEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -13.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -6.4% vs peer median 6.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 85% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IEP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | -13.3% | 5.1% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 5.4% | 13.3% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | -6.4% | 6.0% | 13% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 47.7% | 55.0% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IEP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 4 | 31.65T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 96 | 53 | |
| 115 | 2.5B USD | 14 | 31 | |
| 115 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 14 | 20 | |
| 117 | 6.6B USD | 11 | 28 | |
| 117 | 3.5B USD | 11 | 16 | |
| 119 | 3.8B USD | 10 | 21 | |
| 119 | 7.0B USD | 10 | 44 | |
| 121 | 2.0B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 122 | 3.3B AUD (≈$2.2B) | 7 | 34 | |
| 123 | 1.9B USD | 6 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score