Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IDT Corporation
How IDT Corporation stacks up
IDT · against 122 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 123 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including IDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.3% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 4.3% | 2.3% | 63% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 126 reported | 7.3% | 7.1% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 2.7% | 7.9% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 17.7% | 48.1% | 17% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 4 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 92 | 58 | |
| 5 | 29.5B ZAR (≈$1.6B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 58 | 10.1B MYR (≈$2.2B) | 48 | 66 | |
| 58 | 3.9B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 60 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 45 | 47 | |
| 61 | 3.2B USD | 44 | 57 | |
| 62 | 2.0B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 62 | 2.5B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 64 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 42 | 64 | |
| 64 | 2.1B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 66 | 17.2B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 41 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score