Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IDT Corporation
How IDT Corporation stacks up
IDT · against 124 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 125 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including IDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 15.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 126 reported | 5.4% | 3.1% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 15.4% | 8.0% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 122 reported | 1.6% | 3.5% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 97 | 87 | |
| 58 | 505.7B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 54 | 71 | |
| 59 | 1.45T KRW (≈$1.0B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 59 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 61 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 52 | 58 | |
| 62 | 2.0B USD | 51 | 65 | |
| 63 | 10.7B HKD (≈$1.4B) | 50 | 61 | |
| 63 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 79 | |
| 65 | 1.2B USD | 49 | 36 | |
| 65 | 2.6B USD | 49 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score