Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IDT Corporation
How IDT Corporation stacks up
IDT · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #82 of 147 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including IDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 15.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 5.4% | 5.8% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 15.4% | 9.4% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 1.6% | 4.7% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 79 | 165.6B USD | 55 | 55 | |
| 80 | 554M USD | 54 | 33 | |
| 81 | 303M USD | 52 | 34 | |
| 82 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 46 | |
| 82 | 2.0B USD | 51 | 65 | |
| 84 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 79 | |
| 85 | 1.2B USD | 49 | 36 | |
| 85 | 2.6B USD | 49 | 34 | |
| 87 | 743M USD | 48 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score