Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.
How Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. stacks up
IDR · against 344 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 345 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including IDR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 130.9% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 66.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 63.0% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IDR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IDR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 350 reported | 66.8% | 0.6% | 96% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 197 reported | 130.9% | -2.6% | 90% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 341 reported | 63.0% | -1.6% | 99% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IDR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 220M GBP (≈$286M) | 99 | 97 | |
| 2 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 98 | 46 | |
| 2 | 823.2B KRW (≈$593M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 486M AUD (≈$321M) | 98 | 44 | |
| 2 | 294M USD | 98 | 37 | |
| 6 | 301M USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 7 | 143M GBP (≈$186M) | 96 | 95 | |
| 8 | 3.7B CNY (≈$524M) | 95 | 46 | |
| 8 | 741.2B KRW (≈$534M) | 95 | 41 | |
| 8 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 95 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score