Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ICL Group Ltd
How ICL Group Ltd stacks up
ICL · against 232 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
78/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #61 of 233 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including ICL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.5% vs peer median 3.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 83% of peers. EBITDA yield: 16.1% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ICL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ICL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 232 reported | 5.5% | 5.3% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 236 reported | 16.1% | 10.7% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 6.1% | 4.5% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 226 reported | 109.2% | 50.9% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ICL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155.7B ZAR (≈$8.6B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 1 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 56 | 785.0B JPY (≈$5.3B) | 80 | 59 | |
| 56 | 466.5B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 80 | 47 | |
| 60 | 114.6B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 61 | 54.2B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 78 | 70 | |
| 61 | 5.6B USD | 78 | 48 | |
| 61 | 148.9B THB (≈$4.2B) | 78 | 32 | |
| 61 | 6.0B CAD (≈$4.4B) | 78 | 90 | |
| 61 | 3.21T ARS (≈$3.2B) | 78 | 69 | |
| 66 | 64.2B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 77 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score