Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IBKR · against 51 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #49 of 52 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including IBKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | IBKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 3.3% | 7.8% | 2% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | Not reported | 11.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 21 reported | 12.0% | 12.0% | 55% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 16.9% | 51.3% | 2% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 658.7B HKD (≈$84.3B) | 90 | 42 | |
| 2 | 935.3B HKD (≈$119.7B) | 89 | 61 | |
| 3 | 16.32T JPY (≈$110.9B) | 87 | ||
| 4 | 66.1B USD | 86 | 93 | |
| 5 | 74.5B USD | 83 | 54 | |
| 45 | 108.1B USD | 14 | 42 | |
| 45 | 239.4B USD | 14 | 37 | |
| 47 | 77.7B USD | 10 | 36 | |
| 48 | 279.6B AUD (≈$184.5B) | 8 | 33 | |
| 49 | 132.0B USD | 7 | 53 | |
| 50 | 150.9B USD | 6 | 27 | |
| 51 | 77.0B USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 52 | 154.4B USD | 2 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score