Ranked #80 of 246 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
29 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including IBCP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on equity, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.3% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 71% of peers. Return on equity: 13.6% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IBCP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
IBCP
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 234 reported
13.8%
11.0%
67%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 31 reported
Not reported
8.9%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 248 reported
1.3%
1.1%
63%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 246 reported
14.4%
10.4%
78%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 261 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
