Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IAMGOLD Corporation
How IAMGOLD Corporation stacks up
IAG · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #36 of 183 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including IAG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.6% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 74.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 43.8% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IAG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IAG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 74.7% | 9.9% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -13.6% | 17.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 43.8% | 1.5% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IAG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 36 | 2.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 36 | 277M USD | 92 | 30 | |
| 36 | 8.3B USD | 92 | 66 | |
| 36 | 88.7B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 36 | 9.1B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 36 | 406M USD | 92 | 79 | |
| 42 | 368M USD | 91 | 84 | |
| 42 | 2.1B USD | 91 | 39 | |
| 42 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score