Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MarineMax, Inc.
How MarineMax, Inc. stacks up
HZO · against 510 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #320 of 511 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including HZO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HZO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HZO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | 0.3% | 4.7% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 522 reported | 5.4% | 9.1% | 28% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 15.3% | 7.1% | 79% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | 81.9% | 58.5% | 67% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HZO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 320 | 19.5B TWD (≈$604M) | 37 | 47 | |
| 320 | 131.5B INR (≈$1.6B) | 37 | 55 | |
| 320 | 60.1B THB (≈$1.7B) | 37 | 39 | |
| 320 | 2.1B USD | 37 | 30 | |
| 320 | 1.2B USD | 37 | 33 | |
| 320 | 31.1B TRY (≈$934M) | 37 | 43 | |
| 327 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 36 | 40 | |
| 327 | 4.3B CNY (≈$599M) | 36 | 72 | |
| 327 | 5.0B CNY (≈$693M) | 36 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score