Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MarineMax, Inc.
How MarineMax, Inc. stacks up
HZO · against 523 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #432 of 524 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score44 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including HZO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 81% of peers. Return on assets: 0.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 73% of peers. Operating margin: 3.0% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 69% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.0% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HZO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HZO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 499 reported | 3.0% | 7.7% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 522 reported | 3.0% | 7.1% | 20% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 499 reported | 0.2% | 3.4% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 489 reported | 0.5% | 8.2% | 16% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 526 reported | 34.2% | 31.1% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HZO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 432 | 137.4B JPY (≈$935M) | 23 | 41 | |
| 432 | 4.4B CNY (≈$612M) | 23 | 22 | |
| 432 | 876M USD | 23 | 44 | |
| 432 | 841M USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 432 | 1.2B USD | 23 | 33 | |
| 442 | 1.37T KRW (≈$985M) | 22 | 14 | |
| 442 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 22 | 33 | |
| 442 | 6.9B CNY (≈$964M) | 22 | 35 | |
| 445 | 5.0B CNY (≈$700M) | 21 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score