Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
How Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation stacks up
HYMC · against 441 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #408 of 442 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score35 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including HYMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -7.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.7% vs peer median 3.6%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.3% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HYMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HYMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 436 reported | -5.0% | 4.0% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 450 reported | -7.5% | 8.9% | 2% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 119 reported | -7.3% | 4.0% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 423 reported | 16.7% | 62.7% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HYMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 764M EUR (≈$840M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 408 | 4.7B SAR (≈$1.3B) | 8 | 16 | |
| 408 | 2.5B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 408 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 408 | 926M USD | 8 | 8 | |
| 408 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 408 | 1.1B USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 408 | 898M USD | 8 | ||
| 408 | 2.5B USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 408 | 43.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 8 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score