Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
How Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. stacks up
HVT · against 577 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #270 of 578 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.6% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 569 reported | 4.7% | 3.2% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 589 reported | 8.7% | 8.3% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 8.6% | 7.1% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 64.1% | 64.1% | 50% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 265 | 603M AUD (≈$398M) | 52 | 64 | |
| 270 | 128.4B JPY (≈$873M) | 51 | 46 | |
| 270 | 2.2B CNY (≈$311M) | 51 | 35 | |
| 270 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 51 | 36 | |
| 270 | 459M USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 270 | 593M USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 275 | 5.4B CNY (≈$759M) | 50 | 72 | |
| 275 | 6.5B CNY (≈$908M) | 50 | 67 | |
| 275 | 617M GBP (≈$803M) | 50 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score