Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
How Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. stacks up
HVT · against 589 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #325 of 590 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score73 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including HVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 74% of peers. Operating margin: 2.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.5% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 561 reported | 5.2% | 5.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 588 reported | 2.8% | 5.1% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 560 reported | 3.5% | 2.4% | 63% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 548 reported | 7.6% | 5.4% | 61% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 591 reported | 60.9% | 27.1% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 325 | 95.6B JPY (≈$650M) | 36 | 63 | |
| 325 | 12.6B TWD (≈$392M) | 36 | 45 | |
| 325 | 119.2B JPY (≈$810M) | 36 | 47 | |
| 325 | 116.8B JPY (≈$794M) | 36 | 58 | |
| 325 | 459M USD | 36 | 38 | |
| 333 | 2.6B CNY (≈$368M) | 35 | 54 | |
| 333 | 19.2B TWD (≈$594M) | 35 | 61 | |
| 333 | 3.2B CNY (≈$448M) | 35 | 63 | |
| 333 | 3.3B CNY (≈$455M) | 35 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score