Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
How Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. stacks up
HVT · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #264 of 356 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score32 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including HVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -7.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 8.0% | 5.9% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 0.0% | 6.2% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -7.5% | 4.1% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 258 | 1.0B USD | 37 | 36 | |
| 258 | 119.4B USD | 37 | 39 | |
| 258 | 228.5B USD | 37 | 40 | |
| 258 | 499M USD | 37 | 72 | |
| 264 | 459M USD | 35 | 38 | |
| 265 | 362M USD | 34 | 62 | |
| 265 | 335M USD | 34 | 56 | |
| 265 | 4.8B USD | 34 | 35 | |
| 265 | 13.9B USD | 34 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score