Ranked #205 of 207 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
27 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including HUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.9% vs peer median 7.9%
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 96% of peers. Book yield: 18.4% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HUT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
HUT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 212 reported
-8.5%
7.8%
2%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported
-5.1%
9.7%
10%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 115 reported
-16.7%
9.4%
7%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 206 reported
18.4%
74.6%
7%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
