Ranked #379 of 405 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
44 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including HUT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -6.2% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on equity: -43.1% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HUT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
HUT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 374 reported
-61.3%
11.6%
2%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 75 reported
-295.3%
8.7%
5%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 408 reported
-6.2%
1.2%
4%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 400 reported
-43.4%
11.7%
3%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 411 reported
62.3%
0.0%
86%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
