Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HUBS · against 215 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #109 of 216 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including HUBS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HUBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 207 reported | 0.14× | 0.34× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 206 reported | 1.24 | 1.01 | 34% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 215 reported | 1.38× | 1.66× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 41.6B CNY (≈$5.8B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 105 | 10.5B AUD (≈$7.0B) | 43 | 65 | |
| 106 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 107 | 9.5B USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 108 | 99.8B CNY (≈$14.0B) | 41 | 56 | |
| 109 | 11.6B USD | 40 | 57 | |
| 110 | 229.5B TWD (≈$7.1B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 111 | 201.2B TWD (≈$6.2B) | 40 | 60 | |
| 112 | 16.6B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 113 | 750.6B INR (≈$9.0B) | 39 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score