Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hubbell Incorporated
How Hubbell Incorporated stacks up
HUBB · against 182 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
84/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #66 of 183 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score33 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including HUBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 67% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 86% of peers. Return on assets: 7.6% vs peer median 3.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 89% of peers. Operating margin: 20.2% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HUBB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HUBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 171 reported | 11.1% | 12.5% | 43% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 184 reported | 20.2% | 13.0% | 83% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 176 reported | 7.6% | 5.2% | 65% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 171 reported | 24.4% | 15.7% | 77% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 184 reported | 35.3% | 31.8% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HUBB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.78T INR (≈$33.3B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 25.6B USD | 100 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 12.3B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 5 | 116.2B CNY (≈$16.3B) | 98 | 71 | |
| 63 | 24.6B USD | 85 | 49 | |
| 63 | 11.9B USD | 85 | 63 | |
| 63 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 85 | 50 | |
| 66 | 15.6B USD | 84 | 46 | |
| 66 | 23.7B USD | 84 | 52 | |
| 66 | 17.5B USD | 84 | 60 | |
| 66 | 20.9B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 70 | 24.7B USD | 83 | 61 | |
| 70 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 83 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score