Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to High Templar Tech Limited
How High Templar Tech Limited stacks up
HTT · against 84 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
6/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 85 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score12 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including HTT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 6?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 98% of peers. Operating margin: -972.6% vs peer median 23.5%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: -5.2% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 5.2% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HTT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HTT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 83 reported | -5.2% | 4.4% | 11% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 42 reported | -972.6% | 18.9% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 97 reported | 5.2% | 2.7% | 74% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 95 reported | 6.2% | 5.3% | 55% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 111 reported | 11.9% | 98.3% | 17% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HTT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 97 | 64 | |
| 4 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 96 | 67 | |
| 5 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 74 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 8 | 55 | |
| 75 | 31.7B INR (≈$381M) | 7 | 28 | |
| 75 | 2.4B SEK (≈$242M) | 7 | ||
| 77 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 6 | 23 | |
| 77 | 276M USD | 6 | 40 | |
| 77 | 16.6B INR (≈$199M) | 6 | 14 | |
| 80 | 385M USD | 4 | 36 | |
| 81 | 451M EUR (≈$496M) | 3 | ||
| 82 | 118M GBP (≈$153M) | 2 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score