Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to H2O America
How H2O America stacks up
HTO · against 100 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 101 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including HTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.1% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HTO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 100 reported | 4.7% | 5.6% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 7.3% | 9.6% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | Not reported | 3.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 95 reported | 72.7% | 76.2% | 45% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HTOScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score