Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthStream, Inc.
How HealthStream, Inc. stacks up
HSTM · against 438 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #210 of 439 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including HSTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HSTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HSTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 446 reported | 8.8% | 4.5% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 243 reported | 5.7% | 5.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 5.4% | 5.3% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HSTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 885M USD | 99 | 33 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 3.9B HKD (≈$493M) | 98 | 66 | |
| 206 | 6.8B HKD (≈$867M) | 49 | 56 | |
| 206 | 78.6B JPY (≈$535M) | 49 | 74 | |
| 206 | 17.9B ZAR (≈$986M) | 49 | 62 | |
| 210 | 1.2B SGD (≈$945M) | 48 | 35 | |
| 210 | 969M USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 210 | 519M USD | 48 | 22 | |
| 213 | 5.2B CNY (≈$725M) | 47 | 66 | |
| 213 | 6.3B CNY (≈$877M) | 47 | 52 | |
| 213 | 905M CHF (≈$1.0B) | 47 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score