Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Henry Schein, Inc.
How Henry Schein, Inc. stacks up
HSIC · against 161 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
40/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #121 of 162 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including HSIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.2% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HSIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HSIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 162 reported | 4.0% | 10.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 115 reported | 7.2% | 12.4% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 156 reported | 1.4% | 10.7% | 13% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HSIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 4 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 114 | 4.7B GBP (≈$6.1B) | 43 | 49 | |
| 114 | 4.4B CHF (≈$5.1B) | 43 | 47 | |
| 119 | 47.7B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 41 | 64 | |
| 119 | 77.1B DKK (≈$11.6B) | 41 | 47 | |
| 121 | 9.2B USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 121 | 9.7B AUD (≈$6.4B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 123 | 45.1B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 39 | 53 | |
| 123 | 10.8B USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 123 | 558.5B INR (≈$6.7B) | 39 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score