Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthEquity, Inc.
How HealthEquity, Inc. stacks up
HQY · against 163 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 164 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including HQY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.2% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 68.9% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HQY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HQY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 164 reported | 7.3% | 10.2% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 118 reported | 68.9% | 12.8% | 83% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 158 reported | 13.2% | 10.7% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HQY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 4 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 59 | 8.4B USD | 74 | 28 | |
| 59 | 11.4B USD | 74 | 64 | |
| 59 | 5.3B USD | 74 | 63 | |
| 62 | 1.21T JPY (≈$8.2B) | 72 | 74 | |
| 63 | 8.4B USD | 71 | 67 | |
| 64 | 1.21T INR (≈$14.6B) | 70 | 55 | |
| 64 | 10.6B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 64 | 596.9B INR (≈$7.2B) | 70 | 58 | |
| 64 | 494.7B INR (≈$5.9B) | 70 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score