Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthEquity, Inc.
How HealthEquity, Inc. stacks up
HQY · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #195 of 455 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score52 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including HQY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.2% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 68.9% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HQY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HQY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 7.3% | 11.0% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 68.9% | 21.2% | 74% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 13.2% | 11.0% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HQY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 192 | 97.5B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 192 | 561M USD | 72 | 74 | |
| 192 | 1.3B USD | 72 | 44 | |
| 195 | 296M USD | 71 | 26 | |
| 195 | 8.4B USD | 71 | 67 | |
| 195 | 820M USD | 71 | 41 | |
| 195 | 27.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 195 | 186M USD | 71 | 52 | |
| 195 | 45.2B USD | 71 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score