Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
How Helmerich & Payne, Inc. stacks up
HP · against 126 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #70 of 127 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including HP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.6% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.2% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | -3.7% | 5.1% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 15.0% | 13.2% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 82 reported | 8.3% | 5.9% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 68.0% | 54.8% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 4 | 31.65T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 96 | 53 | |
| 65 | 3.9B USD | 48 | 72 | |
| 65 | 6.2B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 68 | 3.2B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 68 | 2.8B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 47 | 56 | |
| 70 | 3.8B USD | 46 | 45 | |
| 71 | 31.5B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 45 | 33 | |
| 72 | 4.1B USD | 44 | 60 | |
| 72 | 2.8B USD | 44 | 49 | |
| 74 | 5.5B GBP (≈$7.2B) | 43 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score