Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HOPE · against 263 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #195 of 264 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including HOPE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | HOPE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 240 reported | 6.3% | 10.8% | 27% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 39 reported | Not reported | 20.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 265 reported | 0.7% | 1.1% | 29% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 264 reported | 5.7% | 9.9% | 22% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 279 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 1 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 195 | 3.96T KRW (≈$2.8B) | 19 | ||
| 195 | 288.8B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 19 | 52 | |
| 195 | 244.2B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 19 | 48 | |
| 195 | 1.2B USD | 19 | 47 | |
| 195 | 1.7B USD | 19 | 62 | |
| 200 | 2.42T KRW (≈$1.7B) | 18 | ||
| 200 | 159.2B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 18 | 42 | |
| 200 | 197.4B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 18 | 55 | |
| 200 | 2.6B CHF (≈$3.0B) | 18 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score