Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HOMB · against 226 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #111 of 227 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including HOMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | HOMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 232 reported | 8.0% | 7.7% | 55% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | Not reported | 10.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | 7.1% | 9.5% | 36% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 75.3% | 77.1% | 47% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 3 | 54.2B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 4 | 29.5B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 95 | 55 | |
| 4 | 73.3B HKD (≈$9.4B) | 95 | 54 | |
| 108 | 277.2B INR (≈$3.3B) | 48 | ||
| 111 | 6.2B AUD (≈$4.1B) | 47 | ||
| 111 | 4.3B USD | 47 | 54 | |
| 111 | 5.2B USD | 47 | 59 | |
| 111 | 6.0B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 115 | 61.0B DKK (≈$9.1B) | 46 | 39 | |
| 115 | 131.0B ZAR (≈$7.2B) | 46 | 24 | |
| 117 | 1.30T JPY (≈$8.8B) | 45 | 40 | |
| 118 | 4.0B USD | 44 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score