Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Honest Company, Inc.
How The Honest Company, Inc. stacks up
HNST · against 277 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
21/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #199 of 278 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including HNST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.6% vs peer median 4.5%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.1% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HNST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HNST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 270 reported | -2.5% | 4.2% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 283 reported | 2.1% | 9.0% | 21% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 11.3% | 5.8% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 272 reported | 35.2% | 64.6% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HNST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1.4B BRL (≈$247M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 8.06T IDR (≈$500M) | 98 | 84 | |
| 195 | 2.6B CNY (≈$371M) | 22 | 54 | |
| 195 | 63.9B INR (≈$767M) | 22 | 60 | |
| 195 | 737.9B ARS (≈$738M) | 22 | 34 | |
| 199 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 21 | 51 | |
| 199 | 467M USD | 21 | 23 | |
| 201 | 2.2B CNY (≈$315M) | 20 | 18 | |
| 202 | 8.1B TWD (≈$251M) | 19 | 46 | |
| 202 | 607M USD | 19 | 67 | |
| 204 | 2.3B CNY (≈$325M) | 18 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score