Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Harmonic Inc.
How Harmonic Inc. stacks up
HLIT · against 578 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #208 of 579 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HLIT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HLIT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HLIT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 2.4% | 2.0% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 586 reported | 6.4% | 4.1% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 4.9% | 2.3% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 574 reported | 32.4% | 34.7% | 45% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HLIT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 4 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 201 | 721M EUR (≈$793M) | 61 | 50 | |
| 208 | 6.4B CNY (≈$894M) | 60 | 65 | |
| 208 | 84.3B JPY (≈$573M) | 60 | 61 | |
| 208 | 15.6B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 60 | 76 | |
| 208 | 1.1B USD | 60 | 46 | |
| 208 | 20.2B NOK (≈$1.9B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 208 | 7.4B NOK (≈$705M) | 60 | 65 | |
| 214 | 4.1B CNY (≈$576M) | 59 | 23 | |
| 214 | 10.5B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 59 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score